Wed05232012

Last update11:32:06 AM

 

 
 

Faster Faster Hot

An ex-con sets out top avenge his brother's death a decade later. Chaos ensues; none of it interesting or engaging.

Image Gallery

Faster

Editor review

Faster 2011-01-31 12:35:16 Anthony Sherratt
Overall rating 
 
1.0
Story 
 
1.0
Actors Performance 
 
1.0
Cinematography 
 
1.0
Soundtrack 
 
1.0
Reviewed by anthony    January 31, 2011
Last updated: October 12, 2011
#1 Reviewer  -   View all my reviews

More torturous than waterboarding

User Review

User Review
The Internet Movie Database lists two writers for the new Dwayne Johnson movie Faster. If it was accurate it would list every action scribe in existence for this cliche-driven beast or alternatively come up with a new NOT APPLICABLE designation.

This diabolical mishmash of violence, ridiculous car driving and poor sound editing throws nearly every cliche at the unwitting viewer.

In fact if you were playing a drinking game that involved action banality and plagiarism you would be roaring drunk a mere half an hour into Faster.

Which would actually be preferable to watching this stereotypical drivel.

On paper the story is of a con being released from prison and immediately going on a murderous rampage against those who killed his brother.

In reality it's unnecessary slow-motion shots mixed with poor dialogue and peppered with giant potholes and inexplicable actions.

They throw in a slight curve ball with both the police and a likeable assassin chasing The Rock but even the potentially charismatic killer is hampered by a hokum myriad of overused background cliches. I mean he's an internet whiz kid who overcame a childhood disability to become a rich ultimate sport junkie who became a hitman while in love with a beautiful woman who he is contemplating spending the rest of his life with. Oh and he has an accent too. Could you cram much more into the character? Not that they really utilise it anyway.

Despite a strong cast - Billy Bob Thornton, Tom Berenger, Maggie Grace and Carla Gugino - the insipid script ensures this movie will be memorable for all the wrong reasons.

The opening scene - in which the warden delivers a ridiculous exposition speech that is unrealistic in its sympathy, language and plausibility - sets the scene for a film that managed to disappoint even my already low expectations.

Perhaps Faster is part of Sony's anti-piracy strategy. How else could you explain a picture that represents a waste of bandwidth for even those with unlimited plans?

This is not only the early candidate for worst movie of the year, it might even challenge for the title for the past decade.

Even watching the trailer of Faster means the terrorists win.


EDIT: Sadly this system doesn't allow me to give less than a 1 star rating. It certainly wouldn't allow me to give it the 0.2 out of 5 I wanted to.
Was this review helpful to you? 
10
Report this review
 

User reviews

Average user rating from: 1 user(s)

Overall rating 
 
1.0
Story 
 
1.0  (1)
Actors Performance 
 
1.0  (1)
Cinematography 
 
1.0  (1)
Soundtrack 
 
1.0  (1)
Ratings (the higher the better)
Story*
Actors Performance*
Cinematography*
Soundtrack*
User Review
 Yes
 No
Comments*
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Faster 2011-01-31 13:13:52 Stephen Scott
Overall rating 
 
1.0
Story 
 
1.0
Actors Performance 
 
1.0
Cinematography 
 
1.0
Soundtrack 
 
1.0
Reviewed by stephenaxlscott    January 31, 2011
Last updated: October 12, 2011
Top 10 Reviewer  -   View all my reviews

Justice is swift. Vengeance is faster. Diarrhea is a welcome relief.  

User Review

User Review
"Faster" has only just opened and people are already talking Oscars. Waste management, paedophilia, cartography. Any subject to avoid discussing this cliché-addicted car wreck. 

Anyone playing the "revenge killer" / "good cop - divorced bad cop only days from retirement" / "stereotypical bad guys deserve to die" drinking game would have been paralytic within 20 minutes. 

An opening musical montage, gritty alt/rock soundtrack (sorry, even Iggy Pop couldn't save this one), and a multi-billionaire assassin (think anti Batman) with the worst I-don't-even-know-what-nationality-he-was-trying-to-be accent all combined with so much high octane that even the screen appeared to have testicles. 

Side note: I pity Apple who must have paid a lot of money for product placement as it was obvious they didn't pay enough: while IBM computers were the only ones seen, the assassin still sported an iPhone. Sorry Steve, you should have coughed up more to ensure he used an Android. 

Back to the review  Ahem.  If you like action films, this is for you, as it appears to be every previous one thrown into a mincer and turned into splatter sausages. 

There's car chases, backward car chases, bullets through the head, more bullets through the head, the aforementioned clichés, bullets through the head, the obligatory preacher man, the final showdown, bullets through the head, the "I knew it wasn't over" moment, bullets through the head, a funny line (don't get your hopes up - there's just one), and bullets through the head. 

If you're reading this, consider "Faster" for the "so bad it's good category). If you can't read this because the system let you down, then the producers will welcome your money. 

Because this film will make a lot of money. Just not for the reasons Billy Bob and The Rock hoped for. 

Negative five stars for being green-lit even though plagiarism is a crime, two stars for letting me win "guess the dialogue / scenario" for an hour and a half, two stars for giving me a good excuse to catch up with a good mate, and two stars for letting me hold my Admiral Ackbar LEGO magnet the screen to shout "it's a trap!". 

So one star. Why not. I still had fun. 
Was this review helpful to you? 
00
Report this review
 
Powered by JReviews